Re: matrix encoding IS adjacency list
From: David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:19:51 GMT
Message-ID: <HdcYe.1599$vw6.617_at_newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:19:51 GMT
Message-ID: <HdcYe.1599$vw6.617_at_newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net>
"Vadim Tropashko" <vadimtro_invalid_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1127234496.491580.228310_at_g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> At the risk being annoying, formally, materialized path is not an
Oops! It looks like my understanding of "materialized path" was incorrect.
In that case, my comment about using materialized path in a star schema
dimension table
I wonder what the name of that design is.
> adjacency relation. For one thing, materialized path schema design
>
> table (
> path varchar(1000)
> )
>
> has only one column,
was incorrect, as a consequence.