Re: Modeling Address using Relational Theory
From: Mike <mike_at_sherrillshelton.net>
Date: 14 Sep 2005 15:08:46 -0700
Message-ID: <1126735726.013767.313920_at_o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
Date: 14 Sep 2005 15:08:46 -0700
Message-ID: <1126735726.013767.313920_at_o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>
On 13 Sep 2005 14:57:52 -0700, "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
>If the address for a person is in Idaho and the person is in an office
>in Wyoming, you would need to decide whether it is important to also
>model where the person's body is located
[snip]
I said that this fictionalized address
>> RR 2 BOX 1999
>> BEAVER FALLS ID 54321
was in Wyoming, not in Idaho. When you stand in front of this mailbox,
you're not in Idaho. You're in Wyoming. I couldn't tell from your
reply whether you got that.
Received on Thu Sep 15 2005 - 00:08:46 CEST