Re: PIZZA time again :-)

From: Duncan Patton <campbell_at_neotext.ca>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 10:08:29 GMT
Message-ID: <20050903040829.14fd586c_at_babayaga.neotext.ca>


On Sat, 03 Sep 2005 01:40:25 +0200
mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote:

> Duncan Patton wrote:
> > mAsterdam wrote:
> >>I think
> >>merge([[salami, buttonmushroom, buttonmushroom, mozarella],
> >> [salami, mozarella, onions]], M).
> >>
> >>should succeed with:
> >>M = [salami, buttonmushroom, buttonmushroom, mozarella, onions].
> >
> >
> > Sure. But why? A consistent rational needs to be included.
>
> It would be consistent with the heuristic 'don't modify input'.

Ok, then this heuristic might still have bounding conditions that describe the points at which it breaks. eg, you reduce two salamis to one. if the second salami had come between mozarella and cheeze... the example above should mebbe have some more elements, anyways.

Dhu

-- 
???????????????????????????????????????

Can't get good help?  

Contact Fubar the Hack: fubar AT neotext.ca

Area code seven eight zero, Exchange four six six, Local zero one zero nine

Highland terms, Canadian workmanship.

All persons named herein are purely fictional victims
of the Canidian Bagle Breeder's Association.

Save the Bagle! 

Sun Ðhu

???????????????????????????????????????
Received on Sat Sep 03 2005 - 12:08:29 CEST

Original text of this message