Re: PIZZA time again :-)
From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 01:31:25 +0200
Message-ID: <4318e0ad$0$11073$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
>>Assume
>>1. there is a meaningful (or at least consequential)
>>difference between:
>>
>> toppings([salami, mozarella, onions]).
>> and
>> toppings([mozarella, onions, salami]).
>
> It can be yes or not, whatever you like
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 01:31:25 +0200
Message-ID: <4318e0ad$0$11073$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
A.L. wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote: >
>>Assume
>>1. there is a meaningful (or at least consequential)
>>difference between:
>>
>> toppings([salami, mozarella, onions]).
>> and
>> toppings([mozarella, onions, salami]).
>
> It can be yes or not, whatever you like
Hm - you don't like your onions a little brownish? I do, and the assumption is clear, I think. If it is not, please ask.
>>2. A, B, C are lists (conforming to the as yet to
>>be published Spight LIST grammar in relational context).
>>
>>What should
>> merge ([A,B], C). % merge list of lists into list
>>mean ?
>>
>>I think it should merge A and B into C,
>>preserving order, and fail if it can't.
>>
>>Or, if merge(+, +) just fail if C isn't a merge.
>
> It can be both, whatever you like
? What do you mean with 'both' in this case ? Received on Sat Sep 03 2005 - 01:31:25 CEST