Re: PIZZA time again :-)

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2005 02:52:56 +0200
Message-ID: <4318f3bc$0$11068$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>

A.L. wrote:

>  mAsterdam wrote:

>>A.L. wrote:
>>>mAsterdam wrote:
>>>>Assume
>>>>1. there is a meaningful (or at least consequential)
>>>>difference between:
>>>>
>>>> toppings([salami, mozarella, onions]).
>>>> and
>>>> toppings([mozarella, onions, salami]).
>>>
>>>It can be yes or not, whatever you like
>>
>>Hm - you don't like your onions a little brownish?
>>I do, and the assumption is clear, I think.
>>If it is not, please ask.

>
> I don't like pizza.

You might be able to transpose the problem to some topic you do have some affection with.
If you lack that capacity don't bother.

>>>>2. A, B, C are lists (conforming to the as yet to
>>>>be published Spight LIST grammar in relational context).
>>>>
>>>>What should
>>>> merge ([A,B], C). % merge list of lists into list
>>>>mean ?
>>>>
>>>>I think it should merge A and B into C,
>>>>preserving order, and fail if it can't.
>>>>
>>>>Or, if merge(+, +) just fail if C isn't a merge.
>>>
>>>It can be both, whatever you like
>>
>>? What do you mean with 'both' in this case ?
>
> Whatever you like more.

What is your point? Received on Fri Sep 02 2005 - 19:52:56 CDT