Re: Advice on SQL and records
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 07:31:48 +0200
In article <1124733079.712475.143200_at_g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> Paul wrote:
> > To me it suggests a collection of things in order, arranged
> > horizontally. Whereas the attributes of a SQL row shouldn't have an
> > order.
But in SQL, they do.
> You're right that "row" is a less than ideal term, though. The
> best term I can think of would be "member" from set theory, but
> I don't think that term would work out too well.
What's wrong with "tuple"?
-- JonReceived on Tue Aug 23 2005 - 07:31:48 CEST