Re: The word "symbol"
From: x <x_at_not-exists.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:01:17 +0300
Message-ID: <ddvfvi$j63$1_at_domitilla.aioe.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:01:17 +0300
Message-ID: <ddvfvi$j63$1_at_domitilla.aioe.org>
"Roy Hann" <specially_at_processed.almost.meat> wrote in message
news:r6ydnT4Ya7wOo57eRVnyuQ_at_pipex.net...
> "x" <x_at_not-exists.org> wrote in message
> news:ddvebm$grc$1_at_domitilla.aioe.org...
> > Ok as long as one (who isn't a part of that narrow formalized world)
does
> > not forget it is not.
> If the narrow formalized world is fit for its intended purpose then no one
> who is not part of it should ever have any reason to comment on it (or
even
> be aware of it).
Except God :-)
> And if it is not fit for purpose all bets are off.
It seems it isn't. Received on Wed Aug 17 2005 - 16:01:17 CEST