Re: The word "symbol"
From: Roy Hann <specially_at_processed.almost.meat>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:39:30 +0100
Message-ID: <r6ydnT4Ya7wOo57eRVnyuQ_at_pipex.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:39:30 +0100
Message-ID: <r6ydnT4Ya7wOo57eRVnyuQ_at_pipex.net>
"x" <x_at_not-exists.org> wrote in message
news:ddvebm$grc$1_at_domitilla.aioe.org...
> Ok as long as one (who isn't a part of that narrow formalized world) does
> not forget it is not.
If the narrow formalized world is fit for its intended purpose then no one who is not part of it should ever have any reason to comment on it (or even be aware of it). And if it is not fit for purpose all bets are off.
Roy Received on Wed Aug 17 2005 - 15:39:30 CEST