Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
Date: 16 Aug 2005 09:51:54 -0700
Message-ID: <1124211114.723344.278080_at_g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Mikito Harakiri wrote:
>
> My sloppy language apparently caused your misunderstanding. The same
> headers as A, B and C, *correspondingly* but not necessarily the same
> among each other.
> ... Some earlier thread introdiced the small
> latter notation. Given any relation "A" the small letter counterpart
> "a" is an empty relation with the same header.
> ...
> The whole purpse of introducing the (relationa) algebra of empty
> relations (aka relation headers) was to express your condition in the
> lattice terms.
Ah! I see my misreading of your post now.
Unfortunately I will have to wait until this evening to reread your post with the necessary level of attention. Also it appears you have given me a new tool in reasoning about these kinds of problems.
Marshall Received on Tue Aug 16 2005 - 18:51:54 CEST