| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Distributivity in Tropashko's Lattice Algebra
Mikito Harakiri wrote:
>
> My sloppy language apparently caused your misunderstanding. The same
> headers as A, B and C, *correspondingly* but not necessarily the same
> among each other.
> ... Some earlier thread introdiced the small
> latter notation. Given any relation "A" the small letter counterpart
> "a" is an empty relation with the same header.
> ...
> The whole purpse of introducing the (relationa) algebra of empty
> relations (aka relation headers) was to express your condition in the
> lattice terms.
Ah! I see my misreading of your post now.
Unfortunately I will have to wait until this evening to reread your post with the necessary level of attention. Also it appears you have given me a new tool in reasoning about these kinds of problems.
Marshall Received on Tue Aug 16 2005 - 11:51:54 CDT
![]() |
![]() |