Re: The word "symbol"

From: VC <boston103_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 06:15:00 -0400
Message-ID: <z_mdnRTRKvk9IZzeRVn-iQ_at_comcast.com>


"x" <x_at_not-exists.org> wrote in message news:dds7i5$e1g$1_at_domitilla.aioe.org...
>
> "vc" <boston103_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1124114572.711200.256120_at_g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>> No, the names are, in fact, different. The ambiguity issue is
>> resolved by applying the default context which is the decimal base.
>> Should one want to use multiple bases in a formal discourse, one would
>> be prudent to employ unambigous notation: "10(Decimal)", "A(Hex)".
>
>> In the natural language, the name "John" is actually context."John".
>> If the context itself is ambiguous, one can easily resolve the problem
>> by making the context more specific: giving person's last name, John's
>> location at the table, etc.
>
> What is a "context" in first order language ?

A FOL language is context-independent.
>
>
Received on Tue Aug 16 2005 - 12:15:00 CEST

Original text of this message