comp.databases.theory: by date

Friday, 1 July
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: What to call this operator? Jon Heggland
- Re: What to call this operator? Jon Heggland
- Re: What to call this operator? Jon Heggland
- Eliminating Nulls wbarthol_at_gmail.com
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Eliminating Nulls John
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: A good argument for XML Tom Bradford
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Alexandr Savinov
- Re: Eliminating Nulls Mark D Powell
- Re: Normalisation Patsybulo
- Re: What to call this operator? Marshall Spight
- Re: Eliminating Nulls AK
- Re: Eliminating Nulls -CELKO-
- Re: Normalisation Patsybulo
- Re: Eliminating Nulls John
- Re: Eliminating Nulls Neo
- Re: A good argument for XML Gene Wirchenko
- Re: A good argument for XML Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: A good argument for XML Tom Bradford
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Dan
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Marshall Spight
- Re: What to call this operator? Mikito Harakiri
- Re: What to call this operator? Vadim Tropashko
- Re: Eliminating Nulls -CELKO-
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Dan
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Marshall Spight
- Re: A good argument for XML Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
- Re: What to call this operator? Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Eliminating Nulls paul c
- Re: What to call this operator? Vadim Tropashko
- Re: What to call this operator? Vadim Tropashko
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Jan Hidders
- Re: Eliminating Nulls Jan Hidders
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Dan
- Re: A good argument for XML Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying? Dan
- Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying? Dan
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Jan Hidders
- Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying? Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Dan Guntermann
- Re: Eliminating Nulls wbarthol_at_gmail.com
- Sub-Entities wbarthol_at_gmail.com
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
Saturday, 2 July
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Dan Guntermann
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Dan Guntermann
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: What to call this operator? Jon Heggland
- Re: What to call this operator? Jon Heggland
- Re: What to call this operator? Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Sub-Entities Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Marshall Spight
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: What to call this operator? Marshall Spight
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: What to call this operator? Jan Hidders
- Re: What to call this operator? Marshall Spight
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Marshall Spight
- Re: Sub-Entities Neo
- Re: What to call this operator? Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Sub-Entities -CELKO-
- Re: Normalisation Paul
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation VC
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
Sunday, 3 July
- Re: Sub-Entities William D. Bartholomew
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Dan Guntermann
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation VC
- Re: What to call this operator? Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: What to call this operator? Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Simple Example, How To Model It In RM Neo
- Re: Sub-Entities -CELKO-
- Re: What to call this operator? Marshall Spight
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: What to call this operator? Mikito Harakiri
- Re: What to call this operator? Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Eliminating Nulls Mark D Powell
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Eliminating Nulls Mark D Powell
- Re: Sub-Entities William D. Bartholomew
- Intermediate Relational/Set Theory Text William D. Bartholomew
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] David Cressey
- Base Normal Form David Cressey
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
Monday, 4 July
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: What to call this operator? Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Alexandr Savinov
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] DM Unseen
- Re: Normalisation Paul
- Re: Normalisation paul c
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Eliminating Nulls Mark D Powell
- Re: Normalisation Patsybulo
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Patsybulo
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Paul
- Re: Normalisation paul c
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
Tuesday, 5 July
- Re: Normalisation Jonathan Leffler
- source for RM research falcon
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Paul
- Re: Normalisation Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying? Dan
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying? Dan
- Object-Role Modeling? Dan
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Identifying Relation vs Non-Identifying? Jan Hidders
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Dan
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Sub-Entities Gene Wirchenko
- Re: source for RM research -CELKO-
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? William D. Bartholomew
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Dan
- Re: Base Normal Form David Cressey
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation VC
Wednesday, 6 July
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Dan Guntermann
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Dan Guntermann
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Base Normal Form Jon Heggland
- Migrating data from a non normalized source like excel to a well designed Database Hi5
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation VC
- Re: Testing for the equivalence relation Dan Guntermann
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Re: Eliminating Nulls Mark D Powell
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Paul
- Re: source for RM research falcon
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
Thursday, 7 July
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- are sql shortcuts a good practice ? gabriel
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Memorable quotes Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] paul c
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Re: Memorable quotes Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] paul c
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Memorable quotes -CELKO-
- Storing units in the database Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Base Normal Form David Cressey
- Re: Memorable quotes Kenneth Downs
- Re: Storing units in the database Marshall Spight
- Re: Storing units in the database Neo
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Storing units in the database Jonathan Leffler
Friday, 8 July
- Re: Base Normal Form mAsterdam
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Alexandr Savinov
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Base Normal Form Kenneth Downs
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Marshall Spight
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
- Re: Base Normal Form David Cressey
- Re: Base Normal Form mAsterdam
- Re: Base Normal Form mAsterdam
- Re: Base Normal Form mAsterdam
Saturday, 9 July
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jan Hidders
- Good site for data mining resources Admin at Eruditionhome
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Marshall Spight
- cdt glossary - TABLE (was: Base Normal Form) mAsterdam
- cdt glossary 0.0.5 mAsterdam
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Marshall Spight
- Re: Base Normal Form Marshall Spight
- looking for a term paul c
- Re: looking for a term mAsterdam
- Re: looking for a term paul c
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] paul c
Sunday, 10 July
- A Jan Hidders
- Re: looking for a term mAsterdam
- OT Re: A mAsterdam
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Jan Hidders
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE mAsterdam
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Jan Hidders
- Re: A Paul
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Jan Hidders
- Re: A Jan Hidders
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Paul
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE mAsterdam
- Re: Base Normal Form mAsterdam
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: A Jon Heggland
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Paul
- Re: Normalisation VC
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE mAsterdam
- Re: Normalisation VC
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Kenneth Downs
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Marshall Spight
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Marshall Spight
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Marshall Spight
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] VC
Monday, 11 July
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Alfredo Novoa
- Re: A Paul
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? David Cressey
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Re: A vc
- Re: A Paul
- Re: Base Normal Form Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Jon Heggland
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] vc
- Re: A vc
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens] Gene Wirchenko
- cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form) mAsterdam
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE David Cressey
- Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form) David Cressey
- Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form) Kenneth Downs
- Break into the Computer Industry - Get Hired Now FindJobEasy_at_gmail.com
Tuesday, 12 July
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Base Normal Form Marshall Spight
- Re: Base Normal Form Gene Wirchenko
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE dawn
- Re: Base Normal Form Eric Junkermann
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Jan Hidders
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Storing units in the database Misha Dorman
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Jan Hidders
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Jan Hidders
- Re: Storing units in the database Mikito Harakiri
- What's the difference between a database architect and a terrorist? Casey Hawthorne
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Storing units in the database Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation VC
- Re: Base Normal Form Gene Wirchenko
- Re: A good argument for XML arthernan_at_hotmail.com
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: A good argument for XML Marshall Spight
- Re: A good argument for XML Marshall Spight
- Re: Storing units in the database Marshall Spight
- Re: Base Normal Form Marshall Spight
Wednesday, 13 July
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Implementation of boolean types. Ach C via DBMonster.com
- Re: source for RM research Ach C via DBMonster.com
- Re: A good argument for XML arthernan_at_hotmail.com
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Gene Wirchenko
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Paul
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Paul
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: A good argument for XML Jan Hidders
- Re: Base Normal Form Eric Junkermann
- Re: A good argument for XML Gene Wirchenko
- Re: A good argument for XML Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Base Normal Form Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation VC
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: Normalisation Jan Hidders
- Re: A good argument for XML Jan Hidders
- Re: A good argument for XML Jan Hidders
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE Jan Hidders
- Re: cdt glossary TABLE mAsterdam
- Re: cdt glossary TABLE mAsterdam
- Re: A good argument for XML arthernan_at_hotmail.com
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE mAsterdam
- Re: A good argument for XML Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. -CELKO-
- Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form) dawn
- Re: A good argument for XML dawn
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Kenneth Downs
- Re: Normalisation VC
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. dawn
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
Thursday, 14 July
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Ken North
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Tony Andrews
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. dawn
- Re: Normalisation Jon Heggland
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. John
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. -CELKO-
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. -CELKO-
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. -CELKO-
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. -CELKO-
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. dawn
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Dan
- Re: A good argument for XML Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Base Normal Form dawn
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Gene Wirchenko
- Re: cdt glossary TABLE mAsterdam
- Re: Base Normal Form Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. AK
- Re: A good argument for XML arthernan_at_hotmail.com
- Re: A good argument for XML Mikito Harakiri
- Re: A good argument for XML Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? -CELKO-
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. -CELKO-
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. -CELKO-
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
Friday, 15 July
- Re: are sql shortcuts a good practice ? Marshall Spight
- dumb terminology question: candidate key Marshall Spight
- Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Jonathan Leffler
- Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key Marshall Spight
- Re: source for RM research Marshall Spight
- Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. David Cressey
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Tony Andrews
- Re: Object-Role Modeling? Dan
- Re: A good argument for XML arthernan_at_hotmail.com
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. -CELKO-
- Re: A good argument for XML Mikito Harakiri
- Re: A good argument for XML Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: A good argument for XML arthernan_at_hotmail.com
- Re: A good argument for XML Lauri
- Re: A good argument for XML Mikito Harakiri
- Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key paul c
Saturday, 16 July
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees lennart_at_kommunicera.umea.se
- Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key David Cressey
- Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key Marshall Spight
- Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key dawn
- Re: Looking for a good open source database Query Tool sqleonardo)nickyb
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- What a table is. David Cressey
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE (was: Base Normal Form) David Cressey
- Re: Looking for a good open source database Query Tool IchBin
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: Looking for a good open source database Query Tool Sybrand Bakker
Sunday, 17 July
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees -CELKO-
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Proof that relational algebra is eqivalent to FOL Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Drago Ganic
- Re: Storing units in the database Drago Ganic
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Drago Ganic
- Re: Proof that relational algebra is eqivalent to FOL mAsterdam
- Re: Storing units in the database mAsterdam
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Drago Ganic
- Functions are not fundamental to databases. Realtion are. Drago Ganic
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. paul c
- Re: Proof that relational algebra is eqivalent to FOL VC
- C3 linearization MRO mAsterdam
- MS Access IT Studies Keith Austin
- Re: Functions are not fundamental to databases. Realtion are. dawn
Monday, 18 July
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE (was: Base Normal Form) dawn
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Drago Ganic
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. dawn
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. paul c
- transitive closure Marshall Spight
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE mAsterdam
- Re: transitive closure John
- Re: transitive closure Alfredo Novoa
- Re: transitive closure John
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE dawn
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: cdt glossary - TABLE mAsterdam
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees -CELKO-
- Re: transitive closure -CELKO-
- Re: transitive closure Marshall Spight
- Re: transitive closure Marshall Spight
- Re: transitive closure Neo
- Re: A good argument for XML arthernan_at_hotmail.com
- Re: A good argument for XML arthernan_at_hotmail.com
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Mikito Harakiri
- Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!! ampharos
- Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!! Vadim Tropashko
- Re: transitive closure Marshall Spight
- Computational complexity (was Re: Normalisation) Misha Dorman
Tuesday, 19 July
- Re: Computational complexity (was Re: Normalisation) Marshall Spight
- Re: transitive closure Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: Computational complexity (was Re: Normalisation) Jon Heggland
- Re: transitive closure David Cressey
- Re: transitive closure Kenneth Downs
- Re: transitive closure mAsterdam
- Re: transitive closure Neo
- Re: transitive closure Gene Wirchenko
- Re: transitive closure Mikito Harakiri
- Re: transitive closure Marshall Spight
- Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data AC
- Re: transitive closure Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. dawn
- Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!! ampharos
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data Marshall Spight
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data Neo
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data Neo
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data Neo
- Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!! Vadim Tropashko
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data mAsterdam
- Re: Questions about nested intervals. Help me please!!! Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. dawn
Wednesday, 20 July
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: transitive closure -CELKO-
- Re: transitive closure Alfredo Novoa
- Re: transitive closure David Cressey
- Re: transitive closure Marshall Spight
- Re: transitive closure Marshall Spight
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data AC
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data AC
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data AC
- 2NF There are two Definitions which is right Jens Haase
- Re: transitive closure David Cressey
Thursday, 21 July
- Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right Jonathan Leffler
- Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right Jens Haase
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: transitive closure -CELKO-
- What is PI by OSIsoft finarfinjge_at_hotmail.com
- Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right Jon Heggland
- Re: dumb terminology question: candidate key Marshall Spight
- Re: Storing units in the database Misha Dorman
- Re: are sql shortcuts a good practice ? Misha Dorman
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Misha Dorman
- Re: transitive closure Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Frank_Hamersley
Friday, 22 July
- Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right Jonathan Leffler
- Re: transitive closure lennart_at_kommunicera.umea.se
- Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right Jonathan Leffler
- Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right Dan Guntermann
- Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right - amended Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. dawn
- Course Material Available for Intro & Advanced DB Course Ellis Cohen
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
Saturday, 23 July
- Ghost Town Marshall Spight
- Re: Ghost Town Jan M. Nelken
- Re: Ghost Town Marshall Spight
- Re: Ghost Town dawn
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data dawn
Sunday, 24 July
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data AC
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data David Cressey
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data David Cressey
- Re: Ghost Town David Cressey
- Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right Jon Heggland
- Re: Ghost Town Marshall Spight
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data Marshall Spight
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Marshall Spight
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data dawn
- When does one put data into a separate table? Paul
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? Marshall Spight
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? paul c
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? paul c
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. dawn
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data Marshall Spight
Monday, 25 July
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? Tony D
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data David Cressey
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? Paul
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? Tony D
- DBKEY Datatype David Cressey
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data Marshall Spight
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? Paul
- Re: DBKEY Datatype Paul
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data AC
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data Gene Wirchenko
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? Gene Wirchenko
- Just one more anecdote dawn
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. dawn
Tuesday, 26 July
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: Just one more anecdote Frank_Hamersley
- Re: DBKEY Datatype David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote Mark D Powell
- Re: DBKEY Datatype Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: Property sheet, ad hoc, property page, flexible data David Cressey
- Re: DBKEY Datatype Paul
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: Implementation of boolean types. Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Just one more anecdote Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Gene Wirchenko
- Desperately seeking help - db schema piernik
- gender - was Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees paul c
- Re: Desperately seeking help - db schema Paul
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Just one more anecdote Frank_Hamersley
- A simple link, it turns out dawn
- Re: Just one more anecdote dawn
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
Wednesday, 27 July
- Re: A simple link, it turns out Alexandr Savinov
- Re: Just one more anecdote FrankHamersley
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote Mike
- Re: Just one more anecdote David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote dawn
- Re: Just one more anecdote dawn
- Re: Just one more anecdote dawn
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? Marshall Spight
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: A simple link, it turns out Marshall Spight
- Re: A simple link, it turns out dawn
- Re: A simple link, it turns out dawn
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Just one more anecdote Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Just one more anecdote Gene Wirchenko
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? Paul
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: Nested sets in SQL - inventor? Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Nested sets in SQL - inventor? Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: Nested sets in SQL - inventor? Mikito Harakiri
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: Nested sets in SQL - inventor? lauri.pietarinen_at_atbusiness.com
- Re: When does one put data into a separate table? David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote Marshall Spight
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Marshall Spight
- Re: Just one more anecdote dawn
Thursday, 28 July
- Re: Just one more anecdote Marshall Spight
- Re: Nested sets in SQL - inventor? Marshall Spight
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees Jonathan Leffler
- Re: Just one more anecdote David Cressey
- Re: Nested sets in SQL - inventor? David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote dawn
- Re: Three Kinds of Logical Trees dawn
- Re: Just one more anecdote Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Just one more anecdote Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Just one more anecdote David Cressey
- full text indexing Stefan Rybacki
- Re: full text indexing Marshall Spight
- Re: Just one more anecdote Marshall Spight
- Re: Nested sets in SQL - inventor? Marshall Spight
Friday, 29 July
- Re: full text indexing Stefan Rybacki
- Re: full text indexing Matt Monaghan
- Re: Just one more anecdote dawn
- Re: full text indexing Marshall Spight
- Re: Just one more anecdote Gene Wirchenko
- Re: full text indexing Gene Wirchenko
- Re: full text indexing Stefan Rybacki
- Re: Just one more anecdote dawn
- Re: Just one more anecdote Marshall Spight
- Re: full text indexing Marshall Spight
- sql views for denomalizing dawn
- Re: sql views for denormalizing dawn
Saturday, 30 July
- Re: sql views for denomalizing Marshall Spight
- Re: sql views for denormalizing Lauri
- How to build a Datawarehouse schema Murukesh Cbe
- Re: How to build a Datawarehouse schema David Cressey
- Transitive Closure in Maine David Cressey
- Relieving the Boredom David Cressey
- Re: sql views for denormalizing dawn
- Re: sql views for denomalizing dawn
- Re: sql views for denormalizing dawn
- Re: Transitive Closure in Maine dawn
- Types and "join compatibility" André Næss
- Re: Types and "join compatibility" paul c
- Re: sql views for denomalizing Marshall Spight
- Re: sql views for denomalizing David Cressey
- Re: sql views for denomalizing paul c
- Re: sql views for denomalizing paul c
- Re: Nested sets in SQL - inventor? David Cressey
- Re: Just one more anecdote David Cressey
- Re: Relieving the Boredom Marshall Spight
- Re: sql views for denomalizing dawn
- Re: sql views for denomalizing Marshall Spight
- Re: sql views for denomalizing David Cressey
- Re: Transitive Closure in Maine Marshall Spight
- Re: sql views for denomalizing Marshall Spight
- Re: sql views for denomalizing dawn
- Re: Types and "join compatibility" Marshall Spight
- Re: full text indexing Stefan Rybacki
- Re: sql views for denomalizing Marshall Spight
- Re: Nested sets in SQL - inventor? -CELKO-
- Re: sql views for denomalizing David Cressey
- Re: sql views for denomalizing dawn
- Re: sql views for denomalizing paul c
- Re: Types and "join compatibility" paul c
- Re: Types and "join compatibility" paul c
- Re: Types and "join compatibility" Marshall Spight
- Re: Types and "join compatibility" paul c
- Re: sql views for denomalizing Lauri
Sunday, 31 July
- Re: Types and "join compatibility" DBMS_Plumber
- Re: sql views for denomalizing David Cressey
- Re: sql views for denomalizing Marshall Spight
- The naive test for equality David Cressey
- Re: sql views for denomalizing dawn
- Re: sql views for denomalizing dawn
- Re: The naive test for equality DBMS_Plumber
- Re: The naive test for equality paul c
- Re: The naive test for equality paul c

Last message date: Sun Jul 31 2005 - 19:22:19 CDT
Archived on: Sun Jul 31 2005 - 19:41:03 CDT