Re: transitive closure

From: David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 02:28:13 GMT
Message-ID: <1LDDe.6644$oZ.6030@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>

"-CELKO-" <jcelko212_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message news:1121853467.829969.218920_at_g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

[snip]
> >> I'm not as concerned about portability as Joe Celko is. <<
>
> Stay unconcerned. Eventually management gets concerned with
> portability and I can make some big bucks helping them :).
>

I didn't say I was unconcerned. I said I was less concerned than you are. Received on Wed Jul 20 2005 - 21:28:13 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jonathan Leffler: "Re: 2NF There are two Definitions which is right"
Previous message: Jens Haase: "2NF There are two Definitions which is right"
In reply to: -CELKO-: "Re: transitive closure"
Next in thread: Mikito Harakiri: "Re: transitive closure"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US