Re: transitive closure
From: John <no_at_email>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:02:36 +0100
Message-ID: <42db9a5b$0$25802$db0fefd9_at_news.zen.co.uk>
>
>
>
> The middle tier must be an RDBMS
>
>
> Regards
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:02:36 +0100
Message-ID: <42db9a5b$0$25802$db0fefd9_at_news.zen.co.uk>
Alfredo Novoa wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:40:24 +0100, John <no_at_email> wrote:
>
>
>>"Caching is for the middle tier!".
>
>
>
> The middle tier must be an RDBMS
>
>
> Regards
Unconventional, but no problem. Just as long as the persistence tier is authoritative and clean. If the middle tier turns into a mess one can just reset it.
John Received on Mon Jul 18 2005 - 14:02:36 CEST