Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> dumb terminology question: candidate key

dumb terminology question: candidate key

From: Marshall Spight <marshall.spight_at_gmail.com>
Date: 14 Jul 2005 22:09:28 -0700
Message-ID: <1121404168.135954.207810@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


Does anyone have any insight or information on the origin of the term "candidate key"? It seems like a standout bad term in a field full of not-very-good terms.

A "candidate" is something that aspires to a particular position, but hasn't attained it yet. So the term suggests that we're *considering* declaring this set of attributes to be unique, but we're not sure yet. We'll get back to you once we're sure.

What advantage does this term have over the simpler term "key"? Any reason we just shouldn't all say key? We don't say "primary candidate key" or "foreign candidate key" do we?

Marshall Received on Fri Jul 15 2005 - 00:09:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US