Re: Implementation of boolean types.

On 14 Jul 2005 06:03:05 -0700, "dawn" <dawnwolthuis_at_gmail.com> wrote:

[snip]

>Gotta love committees! Perhaps in the next round, just for fun, the

     I do not feel that need.

>standard could permit the word "mom" as another possible value for an
>integer type ;-) But for consistency, at least UNKNOWN should then be a
>recognized value for any numeric types too, don't you think?

     Why not give the type the additional name "mom"?  Think of C:
          mom Mom;
          short mom Susan;
          long mom Anna;
Hmm, make "long" "tall".
          tall mom Anna;

     void main(void)?  How dare you disrespect your mother like that?
Use
          mom main(void)

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko Received on Thu Jul 14 2005 - 19:35:14 CEST