Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: cdt glossary TABLE

Re: cdt glossary TABLE

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 01:20:20 +0200
Message-ID: <42d5a1b6$0$32141$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> 





David Cressey wrote:


> mAsterdam wrote:


>>If you can afford to be informal - think of Down's law.
>>If you need to be concise, don't use 'table'. Use 'relation'.




> 

> No, no, a thousand times no!

> 

> When I say "table", I mean "table"!

> 

> When I say "relation", I mean "relation"  (or maybe relvar).




Your glossary looks extremely boring.
Received on Wed Jul 13 2005 - 18:20:20 CDT












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US