Re: A good argument for XML
From: Mikito Harakiri <mikharakiri_nospaum_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 13 Jul 2005 14:18:21 -0700
Message-ID: <1121289500.939769.127680_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Date: 13 Jul 2005 14:18:21 -0700
Message-ID: <1121289500.939769.127680_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Jan Hidders wrote:
> and their SQL/XML implementation is already in 2.0.
It is well known that some very big name database vendor labeled their first release as 2.0, because they figured out that nobody would bother buying release 1.0. Received on Wed Jul 13 2005 - 23:18:21 CEST