Re: cdt glossary - TABLE
From: Paul <paul_at_test.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:57:16 +0100
Message-ID: <42d57472$0$2893$ed2e19e4_at_ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net>
>
> That would be true (well, not exactly, but anyway) in the relational
> model,
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 19:57:16 +0100
Message-ID: <42d57472$0$2893$ed2e19e4_at_ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net>
Jan Hidders wrote:
>> You could say the table header is an (unordered) set of column names.
>
> That would be true (well, not exactly, but anyway) in the relational
> model,
> but what was under descussion here was the notion of SQL table.
> That's something different.
OK, agreed.
Paul. Received on Wed Jul 13 2005 - 20:57:16 CEST