Re: Base Normal Form

From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:28:30 GMT
Message-ID: <2CWAe.143408$aP1.7605303_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>


Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:42:27 GMT, Jan Hidders
> <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>

>>Note by the way that the link between functional dependencies and 
>>interpreting relations as functions is very close. If the relation 
>>R(A,B,C,D,E) has the dependencies AB->C and BD->E and ABD->C the I 
>>wouldn't say it represents a function, I would say it represents three 
>>functions. 

>
> I struggle to follow these arguments. In the above, I think that
> there is an error or something questionable. If AB->C then
> ABanything->C (as in ABD->C),

Yes, well observed, the FD ABC->C is redundant.

> but what is the point?

A relation can sometimes represent several functions, not just one.

  • Jan Hidders
Received on Tue Jul 12 2005 - 23:28:30 CEST

Original text of this message