Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Normalisation

Re: Normalisation

From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:22:45 GMT
Message-ID: <FwWAe.143403$A03.7623726@phobos.telenet-ops.be>


VC wrote:
> "Jan Hidders" <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote in message
> news:AyVye.138732$g63.7370802_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be...
> [...]
>

>>Ah, but now you are using the domain or relations, right? There is a 
>>problem with that domain. It doesn't exist. The collection of all 
>>relations is a proper class, and not a set, but domains have to be sets.

>
> The collection of all relations is most certainly a set, and therefore, a
> domain, domain being a synonym of set. The term "proper class" implies
> that you talk in terms of set theory other than ZF ( Zermelo - Fraenkel ) ).
> There is no need to do so for the reltional model unless you can show there
> is ;)

There is indeed no such need, unless of course you want to define the domain of relations, which you cannot do in ZF.

Received on Tue Jul 12 2005 - 16:22:45 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US