Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)
From: David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:26:48 GMT
Message-ID: <YeDAe.1973$oZ.1446_at_newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:26:48 GMT
Message-ID: <YeDAe.1973$oZ.1446_at_newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net>
"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message news:42d2e34c$0$14451$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...
> If you can afford to be informal - think of Down's law.
> If you need to be concise, don't use 'table'. Use 'relation'.
No, no, a thousand times no!
When I say "table", I mean "table"!
When I say "relation", I mean "relation" (or maybe relvar).