Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)

Re: cdt glossary TABLE (was: Base Normal Form)

From: David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:26:48 GMT
Message-ID: <YeDAe.1973$oZ.1446@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net> 






"mAsterdam" <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote in message
news:42d2e34c$0$14451$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl...




> If you can afford to be informal - think of Down's law.

> If you need to be concise, don't use 'table'. Use 'relation'.




No, no, a thousand times no!



When I say "table", I mean "table"!



When I say "relation", I mean "relation"  (or maybe relvar).
Received on Mon Jul 11 2005 - 18:26:48 CDT












Original text of this message













  HOME |
  ASK QUESTION |
  ADD INFO |
  SEARCH |
  E-MAIL US