Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]

VC wrote:
>
> [...] A simpler and clearer
> response to the question whether we are going to model, say, bicycles, would
> be just a simple "No", instead of enigmatic "I don't think tthey are
> conceptual objects".

Agreed.

> Anyway, since the article that originated my questions does not talk about
> anything beyond a query language, that is it talks solely about "conceptual
> objects", then my intention of mapping "conceptual" and "semantic", as
> bearing no additional meaning, to blanks was correct, right ?

Right.

• Jan Hidders