Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]

Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]

From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2005 09:17:03 GMT
Message-ID: <jCMze.140826$A%4.7394374@phobos.telenet-ops.be>


VC wrote:
>
> [...] A simpler and clearer
> response to the question whether we are going to model, say, bicycles, would
> be just a simple "No", instead of enigmatic "I don't think tthey are
> conceptual objects".

Agreed.

> Anyway, since the article that originated my questions does not talk about
> anything beyond a query language, that is it talks solely about "conceptual
> objects", then my intention of mapping "conceptual" and "semantic", as
> bearing no additional meaning, to blanks was correct, right ?

Right.

Received on Sat Jul 09 2005 - 04:17:03 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US