Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]

From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 19:38:51 GMT
Message-ID: <fxfze.139605$wo.7297050_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be>

vc wrote:
> [...] To sum up, why cannot we talk about just "objects in the U.o.D" and need this "conceptual object" thingy ?

We can, and we don't.

Jan Hidders

Received on Thu Jul 07 2005 - 21:38:51 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: paul c: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Previous message: Jan Hidders: "Re: Normalisation"
In reply to vc: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Next in thread: vc: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Reply: vc: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message