Re: Object-Role Modeling?

From: William D. Bartholomew <wbarthol_at_gmail.com>
Date: 5 Jul 2005 15:59:49 -0700
Message-ID: <1120604389.394801.195430_at_g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>

UML is quite a flexible modelling language and can be (ab?)used quite easily for modelling relational databases. Classes are used to model tables, attributed are used to model columns, associations are used to model relationships, and operations are used to model procedures. You can also use stereotypes to add database specific attributes to any of these (eg a PK stereotype on primary keys). Received on Wed Jul 06 2005 - 00:59:49 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: VC: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Previous message: -CELKO-: "Re: source for RM research"
In reply to: Dan: "Re: Object-Role Modeling?"
Next in thread: VC: "Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]"
Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Object-Role Modeling?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message