Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin?[M.Gittens]
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:48:42 -0400
Message-ID: <bIOdnXsjNNX0vSvfRVn-iQ_at_comcast.com>
Hi,
"Jan Hidders" <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be> wrote in message
news:waFse.123625$lR6.7006345_at_phobos.telenet-ops.be...
> Alexandr Savinov wrote:
>>
[...]
> After looking a bit longer at your model I think FDM might be especially
> relevant,
Are you talking about the FDM (Shipman) as reperesented by the Daplex language ? If so, my recollection is that the FDM is not much different from the network/OODB approach in which case the argument can be reduced to "the network model/OODB contra the RM". I am sure you know that Daplex, btw, is a navigational language, not a declarative one.
>and probably even more so in it's modern incarnation that is the data model
>for Description Logics.
> To what conference are you planning to send a paper?
>
> -- Jan Hidders
Received on Mon Jun 20 2005 - 03:48:42 CEST