Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that of Date & Darwin? [M.Gittens]

Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that of Date & Darwin? [M.Gittens]

From: Ged Byrne <ged.byrne_at_gmail.com>
Date: 11 Jun 2005 16:34:24 -0700
Message-ID: <1118532864.953500.117150@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>


And this sums up the real problem, which so often gets lost in the discussions.

In practice Nulls are the only solution available, and although problematic they are getting the job done.

Although unanimous in their criticism of NULLs, the DB-Debunks are yet to find agreement on the better approach. Pascal favours the use of meta data, while Darwen suggests the use of vertical decomposition. They do acknowledge, however, that they still don't have the answers.

It is easy to scoff because they are not entire unified on the subject, but they do seem to be the only people to be thinking about the problem  The rest of the industry appear to be satisfied with things as they are. Received on Sat Jun 11 2005 - 18:34:24 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US