Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that of Date & Darwin? [M.Gittens]

From: mountain man <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 02:12:21 GMT
Message-ID: <9G6qe.11776$F7.7682_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>


"David Cressey" <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message news:eY4qe.1879$VK4.35_at_newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> "mountain man" <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote in message
> news:SQhne.9308$BR4.3785_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
>> In this subsequent article, the author makes the assertion
>> that Codd's view of a relational database differs from that
>> of Date and Darwin.
>
>
> Did you mean "Date and Darwen"?

Thanks for the scholarly correction ;-)

> I'm not sure what Darwin would have made of products like Oracle. I guess
> he would have tried to show that it was a product of random mutation and
> natural selection. ;)

   "Darwin's grand vision
    was not wrong,
   only incomplete"

  • Lynn Margulis

http://www.mountainman.com.au/gaia_lyn.html

Best wishes,

-- 
Pete Brown
Falls Creek
OZ
www.mountainman.com.au
Received on Fri Jun 10 2005 - 04:12:21 CEST

Original text of this message