Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that of Date & Darwin? [M.Gittens]
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 02:12:21 GMT
Message-ID: <9G6qe.11776$F7.7682_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au>
"David Cressey" <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:eY4qe.1879$VK4.35_at_newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net...
>
> "mountain man" <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote in message
> news:SQhne.9308$BR4.3785_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
>> In this subsequent article, the author makes the assertion
>> that Codd's view of a relational database differs from that
>> of Date and Darwin.
>
>
> Did you mean "Date and Darwen"?
Thanks for the scholarly correction ;-)
> I'm not sure what Darwin would have made of products like Oracle. I guess
> he would have tried to show that it was a product of random mutation and
> natural selection. ;)
"Darwin's grand vision
was not wrong,
only incomplete"
- Lynn Margulis
http://www.mountainman.com.au/gaia_lyn.html
Best wishes,
-- Pete Brown Falls Creek OZ www.mountainman.com.auReceived on Fri Jun 10 2005 - 04:12:21 CEST