Alexandr Savinov wrote:
> I am sorry, but the only thing I can advice is to read something about
> concept-oriented model. It is difficult because the description is bad
> (I actually lost an interest to it because almost everything is clear
> for me).
So let's get this straight. You have single-handedly developed
something called the "concept-oriented model", which you claim is
better than the relational model. However, you have not managed to
explain this model in a way that anyone other than yourself can
understand, and have now lost interest in trying to do so. Is there
any point in even bringing it up in discussions any more?
Received on Tue Jun 07 2005 - 05:16:57 CDT
