Re: Does Codd's view of a relational database differ from that ofDate&Darwin? [M.Gittens]
From: Tony Andrews <andrewst_at_onetel.com>
Date: 7 Jun 2005 03:16:57 -0700
Message-ID: <1118139417.685355.285880_at_g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Date: 7 Jun 2005 03:16:57 -0700
Message-ID: <1118139417.685355.285880_at_g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
Alexandr Savinov wrote:
> I am sorry, but the only thing I can advice is to read something about
> concept-oriented model. It is difficult because the description is bad
> (I actually lost an interest to it because almost everything is clear
> for me).
So let's get this straight. You have single-handedly developed something called the "concept-oriented model", which you claim is better than the relational model. However, you have not managed to explain this model in a way that anyone other than yourself can understand, and have now lost interest in trying to do so. Is there any point in even bringing it up in discussions any more? Received on Tue Jun 07 2005 - 12:16:57 CEST