Re: Data Constraints AND Application Constraints
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:31:44 +0000
Message-ID: <9mtj31h1qs195jimmle1rg6sa1r6mpbfpk_at_4ax.com>
"David Cressey" <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
>> But surely for a rule like the one above, you would also implement a
>Well... yes I would. But my argument about the DBMS better using it's
But the whole point about this is that that's probably fine if you are
a single developer who is writing one app against the db - your baby!
Then company gets taken over and 5 new apps are being written against
the db. You've retired to the Caribbean and the new programmers don't
have a clue. What happens then?
>> constraint in the db?
>resources stands.
>If it's implemented in both places, the DBMS will still experience less
>traffic, because it won't
>see the bad transactions that get snagged by the application.
Paul...
-- plinehan __at__ yahoo __dot__ __com__ XP Pro, SP 2, if Oracle group then db := Oracle 9.2.0.1.0; else db := Interbase 6.0.2.0; endif As a courtesy to those who spend time analyzing and attempting to help, please do not top post.Received on Thu Mar 17 2005 - 22:31:44 CET