Re: Views for denomalizing

From: David Cressey <david.cressey_at_earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:18:45 GMT
Message-ID: <FtyNd.3681$wK.2493@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>

"Alan" <alan_at_erols.com> wrote in message news:36hd5nF520miuU1_at_individual.net...

> That is why I specifically stated why I was avoiding the distinction. So
> what happens? You bring it up anyway.
>
>

Sorry about that. If you had said something like "the conceptual model is outside the scope of my discussion"
I might have caught on a little better than I did.

I don't mind leaving the conceptual model out of the discussion of normalization. I don't mind it at all.
But when you say you want to treat it as the same as logical, I have a problem with that. Received on Sun Feb 06 2005 - 18:18:45 CST