Re: 3NF question

From: jonnie <jsavell_at_gmail.com>
Date: 9 Jan 2005 16:07:46 -0800
Message-ID: <1105315666.478783.266040@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>

DA Morgan wrote:

> > I respect what you have said. On the otherhand, I would like to say
> > that I believe ID can be an acceptable attribute for an object,
even if
> > a sequential identity scheme is deemed unsuitable.
>
> I disagree. A person table might have a person_id that uniquely
> identifies that person within a specific application. But a column
named
> ID has no place in any set.

OK. If that's all I have to do to get off the fire, then fine. I would like it to be called person_id instead of ID.

-jonnie Received on Sun Jan 09 2005 - 18:07:46 CST