Re: primary and foregin keys
Date: 28 Dec 2004 11:30:44 -0800
Message-ID: <1104262244.852106.27320_at_z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
Noel wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:25:30 -0800, DA Morgan
> <damorgan_at_x.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> >This discussion has all the hallmarks of a bad design and, having
read
> >most of the thread, I am left wondering how many of the contributors
> >have actually taken any time to study data normalization?
>
> It just goes to prove that reading 'most' of the thread is not the
> same as reading 'all' of the thread. If you had, you would have had
> sufficient information to deduce that your suggestion does not meet
> the requirements of the OP, and furthermore, that in the light of
this
> fact, your holier-than-thou attitude makes you look like an ass.
Looks like?!! He is an ass. And one who kisses Celko's ass to make
himself appear knowledgeable :D. The funny part, everyone in
comp.database.* knows it too.
The idiot still thinks "Cobb" invented relational model...?
Dave Received on Tue Dec 28 2004 - 20:30:44 CET