Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:07:42 GMT
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 18:33:48 +0100, "Ja Lar" <ingen_at_mail.her> wrote:
>What, then, was then intention?
>Nothing wrong about "speaking loosely", but why intentionally?
Because I didn't have a lot of time and I thought that it would be enough for being understood.
Regards Received on Thu Dec 09 2004 - 11:07:42 CET