Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?

From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:35:24 +0100
Message-ID: <ogfcr09ue0fpiuarpinq3j8637n9cbnr5r_at_4ax.com>

On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:31:59 +0100, "Ja Lar" <ingen_at_mail.her> wrote:

>
>"Dan" ...
>
>> Databases or DBMSs, Alfredo? ;-)

Databases, databases.

Regards Received on Wed Dec 08 2004 - 00:35:24 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
Maybe in reply to: Rene de Visser: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
In reply to Ja Lar: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Reply: Dan: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message