Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 19:34:06 GMT
>>Alfredo Novoa wrote: >>>Then I can continue to think the same without worry :) >> >>Sure. If you are not worried by incorrect arguments....
> But it seems that you are not able to show any incorrection.
I already did that in this thread and you chose to ignore it.
>>Yes, and as anybody who has actually done some research on OODBMSs knows >>that is blatant nonsense.
> What is nonsense are OODBMS and XMLDBMS research.
Just repeating a claim is not very interesting. Actually supplying some evidence for it would really help the discussion.
> It is clear that Date's arguments are dangerous for the OODBMS retro
> "researchers", and they don't seem to have any decent
> counter-argument, so they try to discredit Date's works with general
> and ad-hominem disqualifications.
Again, some evidence would be nice.
- Jan Hidders