- Wednesday, 1 December 2004
- Re: funny article Jan Hidders
- Re: Serializability of Transactions and Automatic (Number) Generators Jan Hidders
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Ralph Becket
- Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted Jan Hidders
- Re: funny article Costin Cozianu
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Costin Cozianu
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Neo
- Re: Serializability of Transactions and Automatic (Number) Generators Neo
- Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted Ja Lar
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Rene de Visser
- Re: Serializability of Transactions and Automatic (Number) Generators Laconic2
- Re: Database planning - Hierarchical problem - Help needed Jan
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Neo
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Rene de Visser
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Costin Cozianu
- Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted Alfredo Novoa
- Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted Alfredo Novoa
- Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted Alfredo Novoa
- Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Rene de Visser
- Autoincrement column for items with hierarchical relationship Max Kholmyansky
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Rene de Visser
- Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted Rene de Visser
- Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted Ja Lar
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Alfredo Novoa
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Neo
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Rene de Visser
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Rene de Visser
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Paul
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Paul
- Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model? Paul
- Last message date: Wed Dec 01 2004 - 04:54:19 CET
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 15:15:09 CEST
|