Re: Serializability of Transactions and Automatic (Number) Generators

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 30 Nov 2004 19:54:19 -0800
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0411301954.2e6f4aac_at_posting.google.com>

> What is chosen to represent the identifiers is an implementation detail
> and has no place in the logical model.

Does this imply that RM should not expose row ids? If not, why do most (if not all) implementations do? Do you know of any RM implementations that don't. TIA. Received on Wed Dec 01 2004 - 04:54:19 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Previous message: Neo: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
Maybe in reply to: Laconic2: "Re: Serializability of Transactions and Automatic (Number) Generators"
In reply to Jan Hidders: "Re: Serializability of Transactions and Automatic (Number) Generators"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message