Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 1 Dec 2004 10:04:29 -0800
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0412011004.5cbf31bf_at_posting.google.com>

> In common lisp the ultimate type is 't' (short for true)
> which all values are a members of.

Does lisp have NULLs? Is it considered a value? How do lisp programs persist their data? Received on Wed Dec 01 2004 - 19:04:29 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Rene de Visser: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
Previous message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
Maybe in reply to: Rene de Visser: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
In reply to Rene de Visser: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"
Next in thread: Rene de Visser: "Re: Logical equivalence of simple and complex types under the relational model?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message