Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted

Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted

From: Ja Lar <ingen_at_mail.her>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:49:11 +0100
Message-ID: <41a501e3$0$204$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk>

"Alfredo Novoa" <anovoa_at_ncs.es> skrev i en meddelelse news:qbv9q0trk6nrno44af8r854bue0essjgl9_at_4ax.com...
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 21:32:58 +0100, "Rene de Visser"
> <Rene_de_Visser_at_hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> This is true, but this is not the same as you said above.
>>In the relational programming language AP5, a type is simply a relation of
>>arity 1.
>
> Then it is a poorly designed language.

We have now reached the realm of good and bad by definition (ie. opinion or religion), not by argument or deduction. Isn't that where this thread started? Received on Wed Nov 24 2004 - 15:49:11 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US