Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted

From: Ja Lar <jalar_at_nomail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:25:53 +0100
Message-ID: <co1cvd$d4e$1@news.net.uni-c.dk>

"Gene Wirchenko" <genew_at_mail.ocis.net> skrev i en meddelelse news:lt67q0pokl855h84hep2u1f59fntj01g4m_at_4ax.com...
> "Ja Lar" <ingen_at_mail.her> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >conclusions" - eg. establish some formel basis for understanding the GB's
> >(as D&D gives none).
>
> Why not ask him (Date)? You can reach him through the
> dbdebunk.com Website.

I'm sure you can imagine the answer you get there. I know it! Received on Wed Nov 24 2004 - 01:25:53 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ja Lar: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Previous message: Marshall Spight: "Re: Another form of Spight's Law"
In reply to: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Next in thread: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"
Reply: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: 1GB Tables as Classes, or Tables as Types, and all that refuted"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US