Re: Should we propose comp.databases.design?

Kenneth Downs <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net> wrote:

>Tony Andrews wrote:
>
>> Kenneth Downs wrote:
>>> Laconic2 mentioned at one point that he would consider this a useful
>> group.
>>> Personally, I believe much of my own discussion would go there if it
>>> existed.
>>
>> Or perhaps comp.databases.practice? Since these discussions are often
>> about what we are or are not in favour of doing in practice rather than
>> in theory.
>
>I would say at this point we seem to have support for .design, but i have
>never seen .practice come up. Can you be persuaded that they are the same
>thing?

     No, please do not start .practice. The name is ambiguous.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.