Path: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu!spool.maxwell.syr.edu!drn.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!postnews.google.com!z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Tony Andrews" <andrewst@onetel.com>
Newsgroups: comp.databases.theory
Subject: Re: Should we propose comp.databases.design?
Date: 18 Nov 2004 07:30:14 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <1100791814.492293.39610@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>
References: <7vdc62-ro2.ln1@pluto.downsfam.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.131.250.1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1100791818 28653 127.0.0.1 (18 Nov 2004 15:30:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:30:18 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <7vdc62-ro2.ln1@pluto.downsfam.net>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=194.131.250.1;
   posting-account=IJrbaQwAAACC57cNvnaNWPkLUkH3QWCJ
Xref: dp-news.maxwell.syr.edu comp.databases.theory:28392

Kenneth Downs wrote:
> Laconic2 mentioned at one point that he would consider this a useful
group.
> Personally, I believe much of my own discussion would go there if it
> existed.

Or perhaps comp.databases.practice?  Since these discussions are often
about what we are or are not in favour of doing in practice rather than
in theory.