Re: Should we propose comp.databases.design?

From: Alan <not.me_at_uhuh.rcn.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 00:18:02 GMT
Message-ID: <_iTkd.3642$eG4.1492@trndny08>

"Kenneth Downs" <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net> wrote in message news:7vdc62-ro2.ln1_at_pluto.downsfam.net...
> Laconic2 mentioned at one point that he would consider this a useful
group.
> Personally, I believe much of my own discussion would go there if it
> existed.
>
> I have looked into this somewhat and it is fairly easy to propose a group.
> But before doing so, I would ask out loud here if anybody would bother
> voting for it. If there is any meaningful interest, the next move would
be
> to ask the same question in the broader group comp.databases. If it gains
> momentum there, I would be willing to do the work of being the "advocate"
> to get the group through the process.
>
> Any opinions?
>
> --
> Kenneth Downs
> Use first initial plus last name at last name plus literal "fam.net" to
> email me

I have no strong objection, just a concern that there will be even more crossposting than there is now. Received on Thu Nov 11 2004 - 18:18:02 CST