Re: Andrew Tanenbaum AP story

From: Dan <guntermann_at_verizon.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 07:26:46 GMT
Message-ID: <WK%hd.11251$vB.7207@trnddc03>

"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:FzShd.561164$8_6.144052_at_attbi_s04...
> "Dan" <guntermann_at_verizon.com> wrote in message
> news:jcvhd.9820$vJ.253_at_trnddc02...
>>
>> Obviously Linux wasn't obsolete...
>
> Why do you say that? Because it's popular? Is it necessarily the case
> that anything popular can't be obsolete?

Geez Marshall. Take a pill or something. If you wouldn't have snipped second part of the sentence...

"Obviously Linux wasn't obsolete, but Tanenbaum wasn't wrong in some of his criticisms."

Received on Wed Nov 03 2004 - 01:26:46 CST