Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example
From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 06:56:44 -0500
Message-ID: <ebqdnV5zZ-WYThncRVn-oQ_at_comcast.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 06:56:44 -0500
Message-ID: <ebqdnV5zZ-WYThncRVn-oQ_at_comcast.com>
[Quoted] "Gene Wirchenko" <genew_at_mail.ocis.net> wrote in message news:10k8o0p3al3godgeurcbjmeo474l8ba3u9_at_4ax.com...
> I would like to see more agreement on something so basic to OOP
> as objects.
Yep.
I would also like to see more agreement among users of the RDM on something so basic as what a relation is. Received on Sun Oct 31 2004 - 12:56:44 CET