SQL 89 or 92?
From: Konstantinos <noemail_at_noemail.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:41:34 -0400
Message-ID: <10o2fcg89ce9n73_at_corp.supernews.com>
In Access Options, this can be set. I wonder if there are any good reasons why someone should not use the latest ANSI standard of 92, considering they develop a brand new database where no old SQL code exists.
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:41:34 -0400
Message-ID: <10o2fcg89ce9n73_at_corp.supernews.com>
In Access Options, this can be set. I wonder if there are any good reasons why someone should not use the latest ANSI standard of 92, considering they develop a brand new database where no old SQL code exists.
Konstantinos Received on Thu Oct 28 2004 - 20:41:34 CEST