Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light
Date: 27 Oct 2004 17:16:51 -0700
Message-ID: <340f01c5.0410271616.19f66e7c_at_posting.google.com>
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:<LumdnSqoMo7fNeLcRVn-tQ_at_comcast.com>...
>
> Excellent!
Well then maybe you can clue the rest of us as to why it was so 'Excellent!' because it sounded like tiresome tripe from a BPR guy (its the business processes stupid rah rah rah). And I don't see what he has to offer that is so different from SAP. They already have the 'best practices' templates that are supposed to eliminate most of the upfront configuration that is so costly. The point is some new ideas in rapid low cost code refinement (to differentiate yourself in a world of overcapacity and hypercompetition) and configuration managment. Thats the motivation for Netweaver, xApps, and the Landscape stuff.
>
> As I said before, in the "drivel" subthread, I recognize you as someone who
> can add value to this forum.
> That's why I was so disappointed when you called somebody else's
> contribution "drivel". "Wrong" would have been sufficient.
Yes but he's a card carrying member of the Pascal cult so his behaviour is understandable. Received on Thu Oct 28 2004 - 02:16:51 CEST