Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light
From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:15:54 -0500
Message-ID: <clovmb$lpb$1_at_news.netins.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:15:54 -0500
Message-ID: <clovmb$lpb$1_at_news.netins.net>
"erk" <eric.kaun_at_pnc.com> wrote in message
news:1098899907.484940.109850_at_f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> I can buy that atomicity is relative... that seems reasonable. So from
> the point of view of relational theory, sets and lists have no
> structure (their operators can do whatever they like, as with any other
> type), but relations do.
It makese sense to me that types like video and pictures would be black boxes to the "collections engine" but a list of text has a structure that the collections engine could accomodate. --dawn Received on Wed Oct 27 2004 - 22:15:54 CEST