Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light
From: erk <eric.kaun_at_pnc.com>
Date: 27 Oct 2004 09:59:02 -0700
Message-ID: <1098896342.894352.268360_at_c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Date: 27 Oct 2004 09:59:02 -0700
Message-ID: <1098896342.894352.268360_at_c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
> Formal Definition:
> A relation is in first normal form (1NF) if and only if all
underlying
> simple domains contain atomic values only.
>
> Is this definition of 1NF correct or incorrect? And is the criterion
true
> for all relations, or not?
>
> ref: http://nunic.nu.edu/~ckettemb/DBNorm.html
It may be meaningless, and is probably not false.
It could be true because "atomic values" means "values"; and saying "all underlying simple domains contain values" is part of the definition of "domains", although the word "simple" in there is... well, meaningless. At least as it's used.
- erk